I’m No Fan of our Soon-To-Be Anointed God

A fool’s paradise

There is a proverbial bridge that leads to a proverbial place. The place is commonly referred to as “Too Far,” accessible by the abovementioned bridge we just mindlessly crossed. And presently, we appear to be standing on Too Far’s threshold, preparing to get drawn into its vortex. Once in its grip, the journey would not have marked “one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind,” for “Too Far” is a world that threatens to drive a wedge between us and our humanness without us clearly understanding what the next iteration of “us” is.

What will this brave new world offer?

If you could avoid all the sweat, effort, and years of dedication required to become a third-degree black belt in Karate by simply having a chip implanted in your head, would you allow it? Moreover, would one derive any reward from acquiring a skill without experiencing the progressions of the journey and its rigors? One might reconcile the notion: I only have so many years to master so many disciplines, so why wouldn’t I welcome an artificial jolt to increase my repertoire? They wouldn’t be alone, for there are two kinds of people in the world: those who peek in the back of the book when doing crossword puzzles and those who don’t. The consequences? If half the world peeks, eventually, the rest must follow. AI may be the only pathway to achieve the egalitarian world, offering the equality of outcomes, that many foolishly seek. But at what cost? What are the tradeoffs of having the entire human race armed with unearned artificial skills?

The fake intelligence that ate our souls

Recently, I have listened to the praises that some have heaped on AIs ability to compose music. There are 24,576 possible scales in music. Octaves multiply scales. A pianist can press multiple keys simultaneously within a tonal range, adjusting 24,576 scale possibilities to melody/harmony combinations running to infinity. AI can readily access and arrange music’s machinations and components, but does that equal creativity? Can AI explore and capture the essence of Dmitri Shostakovich’s soul—a manic depressive struggling with Soviet authoritarianism—as it was when he composed his fourth symphony? Can AI create the sort of art that flowed from the pens of Led Zeppelin and Bob Dylan when frustrated over a war and on mushrooms? There are too many variables that spark creativity. Thus, I would maintain that music is not the best domain to apply AI.

Oh no, not again!

In 1987, President Reagan uttered the impassioned plea, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.” Despite President Reagan’s entreaty echoing throughout the world, the wall didn’t come down the next day; it took a year or so. Along with the wall tumbled Soviet Communism and The Cold War. The long, dark night that had gripped two superpowers and a world fraught with anxiety had finally ended. But now begs the question, is AI the next iteration of the nuclear arms race? It would appear to be the case. What’s more, I’ve noticed something: Whenever humans lean into their paradoxical predilection for creating entities capable of threatening their existence, be it in the abstract or tactile, they don’t tend to “half-ass it,” it’s often “the full Monty.” I don’t know how vast the universe is, but we are, undoubtedly, its greatest irony.

Yeah, I’m a grumpy old man who doubts everything

If I sound like an AI apostate, it’s because I am. Presently, AI is an expensive toy that offers a bleak future. Were we to relegate its uses to such vital tasks as consumer price indexing, devising smarter methods and grids for distributing energy and clean water, and taking nuclear fusion from the stages of occasional testing to an applicable reality capable of solving problems like plastic in the ocean and atmospheric stressors, I would turn cartwheels. But instead, we have it gunning for the arts and humanities because we like to tinker and fascinate for the sake of markets and profit more than we like to solve problems.

Everyone, have a lovely weekend. And remember to take time breaking a sweat engaging in a discipline and listen to real music. And while you’re at it, plug into the wild, unconstrained passion of the Allman Brothers “The Whipping Post.” https://youtu.be/nfrSIUE3iAE?si=klYdZpsaPrVsCm Trust me, you’ll get the relevance. And when it’s over, you can tell AI to go f#%k itself.

3 responses to “I’m No Fan of our Soon-To-Be Anointed God”

  1. Well stated. I may be old. I may be grumpy. I may be cynical. However, I am not so short sighted. Computers, including AI and brain implanted interfaces, are tools. Tools are meant to help not be put in control. Without the journey of knowledge, you lose the fundamentals and bases that all subsequent knowledge is built. “Book” knowledge, or in this case AI granted knowledge is not the same as practical knowledge/ practical experience in the use of said knowledge. At some point, everyone needs the fundamentals to understand what they believe, know, or do, in order to build further upon. Without understanding the fundamental building blocks, the structure is unstable. In the analogy of knowing karate without training, an individual may recognize the movements and form yet without experience, there is no real technique or mastery. Then there is the field of medicine. Having the unnatural given medical knowledge does not guarantee the implementation of actually installing an IV line, drawing blood or performing an operation. Having “book” knowledge is not practical knowledge. Yet, that is the short sighted version.
    The long version? Call it a conspiracy, but when you can program knowledge, you can program the individual. Thus, you can control belief, the way someone thinks, and the human spirit. You can remove individuality and self reliance. Some would say controlling what someone thinks will reduce or eliminate conflict. I say control is control and that kind of control is a type of slavery, its bondage to the ruling powers that dictate what the AI and interface chips dissimulates. Individuals stop thinking for themselves even more than they do now and are stripped of their humanity.
    Then, there is the two way element of knowledge. When AI can import knowledge through a chip, then it can conceivably export what the individual thinks. This would be the ultimate thought control and the concept of the “Thought Police” would become more of a reality than it already is in some parts of the world. We can see it already in our computers, phones, televisions, and other devices as well as social media and news outlets. Our devices tell us what to watch, what to buy, what to think, and what to do to conform to the system. AI and chips WILL force conformity but that is a deeper rabbit hole that even Alice would shy away from.
    Fight the system, be a thinking, informed individual and not a mindless follower who is told what to think without question.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. There are multiple iterations of slavery, and they are all ganging up on freedom. Zoomers and Millennials will not miss freedoms they never experienced, and that is what’s going to make threading this needle a much trickier task.

      Liked by 1 person

  2.  Avatar
    Michael DeStefano

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a reply to abn4eternity Cancel reply